8/14/2023 0 Comments Speakeasy net test![]() But both of these are not gigabit service. In contrast, my speed test for Fusion (same location, ADSL ~8Mpbs) and Comcast (different location, ~150Mbps) are consistent. Same setup, system configuration not changed, random test times over six month period. wired connection, single server, no other user/usage, etc. This leads me to think, not all speed test sites are capable of testing gigabit speeds. Second, I have tried numerous speed test sites including, ,, , /speedtest/, /, etc., and the results from each test site all differ quite a bit on successive tests. I should add the majority of tests are above 500 Mbps. I have gotten close on a couple of occasions so I know my setup can reach 1 Gpbs speeds. Here are today's results: įirst, I never gotten speeds (up or down) over 900 Mbps. I have randomly done over a dozen speed tests over a period of time. If you suspect you're paying for more bandwidth than you're actually getting, you needn't trust your ISP's test results to make your case - especially if you happen to live in one of your service's dead zones.I've gotten my gigabit service for six months now and my speed test results are all over the board. HTML5-based speed tests such as those offered by and seem to have an advantage in that they require no additional software. Whether any of the speed tests I tried truly represent real-world network traffic is debatable. One of the dozen-or-so tests recorded a download speed of 10.4Mbps, and several of Ookla's Flash-based test results exceeded 12.5Mbps for downloads.Īfter conducting more than 100 network speed tests from many different providers over the course of several days, I'm confident my ISP is delivering speeds approximating - and perhaps exceeding - those it promised when I signed up for the service. With only one exception, all the download tests I ran at the AT&T Internet Speed Test and at Ookla's indicated speeds of 11.5Mbps or greater. The FCC's test also requires that you supply your street address.) (Note that the Java-based network tester at the FCC's runs on the Measurement Labs platform, which doesn't support the Safari, Google Chrome, or Opera browsers. The company's speed tests are provided by Ookla, as are the tests at many other network providers. As we would like to think, the Speakeasy speed test records solid and exact information with regards to download and upload speeds, which is clearly the main. Not surprisingly, the highest consistent speeds were reported when I ran the tests offered by my ISP, AT&T. The results of the HTML5-based speed tests conducted at Bandwidth Place ranged from 5Mbps to 11Mbps, those at exhibited a similar range, and the Flash-based tests at ZDNet's Broadband Speed Test recorded speeds from 5.8Mbps to 11.4Mbps. 's download scores in both its single- and multithread tests exhibited a bit more range than those of Speakeasy's Speed Test, but they averaged about 11.2Mbps. After running several tests over a span of days, all of Speed Test's download results were within a few kilobits of 11.5Mbps. Of course, the services' tests may be consistently wrong. ![]() Step 3: Rerun our speed test with the wired connection, and compare the results against. Step 2: Connect a wired desktop or laptop to one of the wireless gateway’s Ethernet ports. The most consistent test results were recorded at Speakeasy's Flash-based Speed Test and at 's HTML5-based tester. Step 1: Run our speed test on a smartphone, tablet, or laptop connected to your Wi-Fi network while standing next to your router and record the speed test results. Others point out that multithread tests such as those used by Ookla ( and branded by many ISPs) don't represent real-world network traffic as well as single-thread tests. Many experts claim HTML5-based speed tests are more accurate than tests that use Java and Adobe Flash. Does the type of speed test make a difference? ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |